top of page
Creamy Waves

Backstory

The association of the term "Asperger's Syndrome" with Dr. Hans Asperger, the Austrian pediatrician who first described the condition, has become controversial due to revelations about his connections to Nazi ideology and policies during World War II. These findings, largely brought to public attention through historical research in recent decades, have prompted a reevaluation of honoring Asperger's name within the autism community.

​

Alternative Frameworks

Given advancements in autism research, many argue there is no need to continue using Asperger’s outdated diagnostic term when autism can now be understood as a spectrum. The DSM-5 already phased out Asperger’s Syndrome in 2013, simplifying it under Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

​

Who was Hans Asperger?

Dr. Hans Asperger was a pediatrician in Vienna who, during the 1940s, observed and recorded behaviors of children with social and communication difficulties, restricted interests, and rigid patterns of behavior. His work focused on children who were often highly intelligent and verbal but struggled with social integration. He referred to these children as having "autistic psychopathy," describing traits that were later incorporated into the diagnostic category known as Asperger's Syndrome (introduced much later in the 1980s). His research differed from studies by Dr. Leo Kanner, the American psychiatrist who had described "classic autism" — which was more associated with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

The Controversy: Asperger’s Links to Nazism


During World War II, Austria was under Nazi control, and Hans Asperger worked as a physician in a medical system heavily influenced by the eugenics policies of the Nazi regime. Under Adolf Hitler's ideology, the Nazis sought to create a "genetically pure" society and implemented programs to eliminate individuals with disabilities, who were deemed genetically "unfit." This included the T4 Euthanasia Program, in which individuals with physical or intellectual disabilities were systematically killed or experimented upon in Nazi-held institutions.


Recent historical studies, including those by medical historian Herwig Czech in 2018, uncovered documented evidence suggesting that Asperger was more deeply implicated in Nazi practices than previously understood.

​

Key accusations include:

Deference to Nazi Ideology. Asperger demonstrated support for Nazi policies like eugenics. While he did not formally join the Nazi Party, historical documents show that he aligned himself with its ideology to advance his career. For instance, he wrote approvingly of concepts like heredity and racial purity in his academic work to better align with Nazi scientific standards.


Referrals to Am Spiegelgrund Clinic

One of the more disturbing findings involves Asperger's role in referring children with severe disabilities to the Am Spiegelgrund Clinic, a facility notorious for participating in the Nazi euthanasia program. Many children sent to this clinic were murdered or subjected to inhumane experiments. Asperger, in some cases, identified children as "uneducable" or "unsuitable for care," which, under Nazi policies, often equated to a death sentence.


Selective Protection of Autistic Children

 Asperger’s notes reveal he often framed certain children with autism-like traits (e.g., those with high intelligence or perceived skills) as "useful" or "potentially productive" to society, while deeming others with more severe disabilities as less worthy of care. By selectively protecting children with autism who exhibited "acceptable" traits, he may have allowed more severely impaired children to face euthanasia or institutionalization.


Public Misrepresentation?

After the war, Asperger portrayed himself as a victim of, or as someone who resisted, the Nazis. This narrative persisted for decades but has been challenged by contemporary research that paints him more as a collaborator willing to act within the Nazi system, even if indirectly or pragmatically.
 


 

The Debate Around Asperger’s Name

The discovery of Asperger’s potential complicity in Nazi policies has led to difficult questions about whether his name should continue to be associated with the autism diagnosis.

 

Arguments Against Using the Name Asperger's


Ethical Concerns

Honoring Asperger’s name in a diagnostic label could be seen as glorifying or absolving a person aligned with an oppressive regime responsible for the deaths of countless individuals with disabilities. This is especially painful for autistic individuals and families, given the historical targeting of disabled people during the Holocaust.

​


Separation of Work from Ethics?

Some argue that Asperger’s scientific contributions about autism can be treated separately from his alleged wartime actions. His observational work in identifying traits of autism-like behaviors in children was foundational and paved the way for later understanding of autism.


Historical Complexity

Others point to the complexity of surviving as a professional in a Nazi-controlled system. While his actions were problematic, some argue that they were partly driven by survival in a dangerous regime and may not fully reflect his personal beliefs.

​

Impact on the Autism Community

The revelations about Hans Asperger's ties to Nazism have sparked debates within the autism community about identity and history. For years, individuals diagnosed with "Asperger's Syndrome" valued the term because it provided a sense of identity and recognition, separate from the stigma often associated with "autism." After the DSM-5 eliminated "Asperger's Syndrome" as a separate diagnosis in favor of the Autism Spectrum Disorder label, many individuals already felt a sense of loss. The controversy surrounding Asperger’s Nazi connections has further amplified the discomfort, as it ties their former diagnosis to dark ethical and historical issues.

​

Current Perspectives

Shift to Autism Spectrum Disorder: Many autism advocates and clinicians welcome the elimination of "Asperger's Syndrome" as a diagnosis, preferring to use Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to describe a range of abilities and challenges. This unified term avoids the association with Asperger’s controversial history and reflects a more inclusive understanding of autism.


Ongoing Education and Accountability

 Others believe it is important to confront history openly rather than erase it. The removal of "Asperger's" highlights the need to continually evaluate the ethics of honoring historical figures in medical diagnoses and ensure modern practices prioritize inclusivity and accountability.

​

Final Note

The link between Hans Asperger and Nazism represents a troubling chapter in the history of autism studies. While his name has contributed to greater awareness of autism, his legacy is overshadowed by ethical concerns about his collaboration with an oppressive regime that targeted individuals with disabilities. For many in the autism community, this controversy underscores the importance of acknowledging and respecting all individuals on the spectrum, while also critically evaluating how historical medical figures are remembered.
 

White Background

NDcampus.org launch - 2025

 

 COPYRIGHT 2025 - Neurodiverse Endeavors - Disclaimer
​
bottom of page