

Speaking about Dyslexia
Neurodivergent conditions and language descriptors.



Why Does Language Matter?
It's important to be mindful of the language used when referring to individuals with dyslexia, as incorrect or insensitive terminology can perpetuate stigma or negative perceptions. Here are some key considerations:
​
Issues to Avoid
-
Labeling: Referring to someone solely as a "dyslexic" person can be seen as reductive and may define them by their condition rather than recognizing them as a whole person.
-
Negative Connotations: Using terms that imply inferiority, incompetence, or shame can be harmful. It's crucial to emphasize strengths and abilities.
-
Outdated Language: Terms like "learning disabled" can be viewed as negative. It’s better to use "specific learning disability" or refer to individuals as "learners with dyslexia."
-
Stigmatizing Language: Avoid language that suggests dyslexia is a failure or disease. This can foster feelings of inadequacy among those with the condition.
​​
Preferred Practices:
-
Use person-first language (e.g., "individuals with dyslexia") to prioritize the person over the condition.
-
Highlight strengths and potential, recognizing that dyslexia does not determine a person's intelligence or capabilities.
-
Be respectful and understanding, acknowledging that experiences with dyslexia can vary greatly from person to person.
​​
By being conscious of how we refer to individuals with dyslexia, we can contribute to a more supportive and inclusive environment.
Dyslexia Definitions
​
-
Defining Dyslexia
-
Clinical Definition​
-
Why Test for Dyslexia?​​
More to follow...​​
