.png)
Label it? Label You? Label Me?
Labels used with types of neurodivergences significantly shape perceptions and understanding of individuals with diverse neurological conditions. Here are some key points to consider regarding labels used with neurodivergence:
Identity vs. Pathology
Labels can impact how individuals view themselves and others. Some may embrace neurodivergent labels as part of their identity and empowerment, while others may perceive these labels as stigmatizing or pathologizing.
Social Acceptance
The use of labels can affect social acceptance and inclusion. Positive and affirming labels can promote understanding and acceptance of neurodivergent individuals in society.
Medical vs. Social Model
Descriptors can align with varying perspectives on disability. Medical terminology centers on shortcomings and limitations, whereas social terms highlight external obstacles and societal perceptions that influence disability.
Intersectionality
Labels should consider the intersectionality of identities. Individuals may identify with multiple labels, such as being neurodivergent and part of another marginalized group, highlighting the complexity of their experiences.
Evolution of Understanding
The understanding of neurodivergences is constantly evolving, leading to changes in labels and terminology. It is essential to stay informed.
Self-Determination
Individuals should have the autonomy to choose how they identify and the labels they use to describe their neurodivergent experiences.
Language and Terminology
Labels should incorporate respectful language that aligns with individual preferences. For an example of how language is used within a neurodivergence, please refer to the pages, "Speaking about Autism", "Speaking about ADHD", and "Speaking about Dyslexia" to learn more about terms used. Some individuals with neurodivergences feel that using "person-first" phrases like "person with autism" does not fully capture their identity. Instead, they prefer more direct labels ("identity-first"), such as "autistic," as these terms reflect an integral part of who they are. Both person-first and identity-first language serve as valid ways for individuals to express themselves, allowing them to choose the terminology that most holistically represents their experiences and identity. Ultimately, the choice of language is deeply personal and should be respected as a reflection of their unique perspective.